/ Home
/ SUBMISSION

/ The BJNANO
/ Diamond Open Access
/ Journal Statistics
/ Editorial Board
/ Community
/ Call for papers

/ Latest Articles
/ Most accessed
/ Thematic issues
/ Volumes
/ Authors

/ Alerts

/ TWITTER
/ LINKEDIN
/ Mastodon
/ RSS FEED

Empty search

Article Type

Publication Date Range

Search Tips

This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.

Search Examples

aromatic	the word “aromatic”
aromatic aldehyde	the word “aromatic” OR “aldehyde”
+aromatic +aldehyde	both words “aromatic” AND “aldehyde”
+aromatic -aldehyde	the word “aromatic” but NOT “aldehyde”
“aromatic aldehyde”	the exact phrase “aromatic aldehyde”
benz*	words which begin with “benz”, such as “benzene” or “benzyl”
benz*yl	words that begin with “benz” and end with “yl”, such as “benzyl” or “benzoyl”
benzyl~	words that are close to the word “benzyl”, such as “benzoyl” (i.e., fuzzy search)

Search results

Search for "bottom-up particle synthesis" in Full Text gives 1 result(s) in Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology.

Review and outlook: from single nanoparticles to self-assembled monolayers and granular GMR sensors

Alexander Weddemann,
Inga Ennen,
Anna Regtmeier,
Camelia Albon,
Annalena Wolff,
Katrin Eckstädt,
Nadine Mill,
Michael K.-H. Peter,
Jochen Mattay,
Carolin Plattner,
Norbert Sewald and
Andreas Hütten

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2010, 1, 75–93, doi:10.3762/bjnano.1.10

interactions is discussed. Keywords: bottom-up particle synthesis; dipolar particle coupling; granular giant magnetoresistance sensor; magnetic nanoparticles; self-assembly; Introduction Magnetic nanoparticles have been thoroughly studied during the last decades due to their many promising applications in

PDF

Figure 1: Schematic representation of the precursor concentration according to the LaMer model. The blue line...

Jump to Figure 1

Figure 2: Interaction of different ligands with the surface of a metallic nanoparticle. There is only a singl...

Jump to Figure 2

Figure 3: Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of Co particles of various sizes and morphologies syn...

Jump to Figure 3

Figure 4: (a) Nanoparticles synthesized by micro emulsion approach and (b) by employment of the synthetic pro...

Jump to Figure 4

Figure 5: Hypothesized particle formation during the biomineralization process in magnetotactic bacteria (in ...

Jump to Figure 5

Figure 6: Dynamic evolution of different concentrations for the decay rates k₁ = 0.00753 s⁻¹ and k₂ = 0.0136 s...

Jump to Figure 6

Figure 7: Co particles with a diameter of 4.9 and 10 nm measured at room temperature shortly after the prepar...

Jump to Figure 7

Figure 8: Self-assembled FeCo nanoparticles with different dimensions: (a) The 2D-monolayer of 4.6 nm sized s...

Jump to Figure 8

Figure 9: (a) Scheme of two particles with a metallic core of radius R surrounded by a ligand shell of the th...

Jump to Figure 9

Figure 10: Images of self-assembled spherical Co nanoparticles: (a) TEM image of a bimodal distribution; large...

Jump to Figure 10

Figure 11: TEM images of self-assembled Co particles with different morphologies. Nanodisks exhibit a typical ...

Jump to Figure 11

Figure 12: Schematic representation of the tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR) sensor setup for the detection of mu...

Jump to Figure 12

Figure 13: Properties of the magnetoresistive sensors. (a) Comparison between experimental and numerical data....

Jump to Figure 13

Figure 14: GMR response of a monolayer consisting of 8 nm Co particles covered by a thin Cu film. Measurements...

Jump to Figure 14

Figure 15: Magnetoresistance measurements at room temperature on a granular system consisting of Co nanopartic...

Jump to Figure 15

Figure 16: Magnetization evolution of four interacting magnetic dipoles arranged in the corners of a square wi...

Jump to Figure 16

Figure 17: Equilibrium states of 10 × 10-particle arrays with cubic and hexagonal symmetry. Magnetic moments i...

Jump to Figure 17

Figure 18: Direction dependent responses of different small particle assemblies to an external magnetic field....

Jump to Figure 18

Figure 19: Response maps of a 10 × 10-hexagonal gGMR sensor for a probe particle with R_p = 50 nm and M_p = 500 ...

Jump to Figure 19

Figure 20: Comparison between free (dotted) and hysteretic (line) sensor behavior for cubic and hexagonal symm...

Jump to Figure 20

Album

Review

Published 22 Nov 2010

Full text

Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities

/ Help / Support & Contact / Alerts / Privacy Policy / Terms & Conditions / Impressum